Trump is getting rid of paper straws. That’s (partly) a good thing, environmentalists say
Trump is getting rid of paper straws. That’s (partly) a good thing, environmentalists say
트럼프, 종이 빨대 폐기 추진… 환경 운동가들 “부분적으로는 긍정적”
Background
종이 빨대는 플라스틱 빨대의 친환경적인 대체품으로 도입되었지만, 지나치게 빠르게 분해되고 생산 과정에서 상당한 물과 에너지가 필요하다는 단점이 있다. 도널드 트럼프 대통령이 이러한 종이 빨대의 사용에 대해 반대하면서 플라스틱을 대체할 최선의 대안을 둘러싸고 논쟁이 다시 시작되었다.
트럼프의 이 같은 '종이 빨대 사용'에 대한 반대는 긍정적인 측면에서 보면, 보다 기능적이고 환경 친화적인 대안을 개발할 필요성을 부각시키는 계기가 될 수 있다. 이는 종이 뿐만 아니라 지속 가능한 포장재와 소재 전반에 걸친 혁신을 촉진하는 데에도 도움이 될 것이다. 일부 환경 운동가들은 종이 빨대 사용을 금지하면, 업계가 생 분해성 또는 재사용 가능한 소재와 같은 더 지속 가능한 대안을 모색하도록 유도할 수 있다고 주장한다.
그러나 플라스틱 빨대는 분해되는 데 수세기가 걸리고 해양 쓰레기의 주요 원인이 되기 때문에, 다시 플라스틱으로 회귀할 경우 오염 문제가 더욱 심각해질 수 있다. 그리고 플라스틱 빨대 규제를 철회하게 되면, 일회용 플라스틱 감축을 위한 기존의 노력을 무력화할 위험이 따른다.
이번 논쟁은 단기적인 해결책에 의존하기보다는 실용적이고 장기적인 대안을 마련하는 것이 중요하다는 점을 다시 한번 상기 시킨다. 궁극적으로, 종이와 플라스틱 중 하나를 선택하는 데 그칠 것이 아니라, 편리함과 지속 가능성의 균형을 맞출 수 있는 보다 나은 대안을 개발하는 것이 핵심이다.
Half a billion straws are used in the United States every day, according to a popular — but perhaps not the most scientific — estimate.
The biggest buyer: the federal government, which buys more straws than any other group in the US. Straws are used in national parks, federal buildings and embassies, among other places.
This week, President Donald Trump reversed course on a Biden administration environmental initiative that had eliminated single-use plastics like straws in federal buildings. The common alternative: paper straws.
“We’re going back to plastic straws. (Paper straws) don’t work. They break. They explode If something’s hot. They don’t last very long, like a matter of minutes, sometimes a matter of seconds. It’s a ridiculous situation,” Trump said from the Oval Office on Monday, when he signed an executive order on the matter.
The executive order directs federal agencies to make sure that “paper straws are no longer provided” in agency buildings.
Many Americans agree with the president’s dislike for paper straws, including critics like Jon Stewart who proclaimed on this week’s “Daily Show”: “OK, he’s right on this one.”
But for some in the straw industry, the conversation has moved beyond paper versus plastic.
“We agree that paper straws don’t work and they’re not a good solution,” said Ken Jacobus, CEO of Good Start Packaging, an eco-friendly compostable food packaging company. “What’s disappointing about the executive order is that it makes paper straws kind of a red herring to get consumers to believe that our only choices are paper and plastic when it comes to straws and the industry has already moved way past that.”
Good Start Packaging makes straws, utensils and to-go containers for restaurants and federal facilities. Their straws are made from canola oil and can biodegrade on land and in the ocean.
In 2020, during his first term, Trump signed the Save Our Seas 2.0 Act designed to “raise international awareness of plastic waste and combat marine debris.”
But back at the Oval Office on Monday, Trump said, “I don’t think plastic is going to affect a shark much as they’re munching their way through the ocean.”
Some major retailers have gone straw-free, such as Starbucks in 2020. The company currently offers compostable straws upon request.
And 75% of US adults say they’ll have to make at least one sacrifice in their lifetime because of climate change, according to December report from Pew Research Center.
“More and more people are concerned about the environment, especially young people, but… (the straw) has to function,” said Jacobus.
The costs of paper vs. plastic
Part of Trump’s executive order was aimed at reducing the price of paper straws, which can cost between five to 12 cents per unit. Plastic straws cost under two cents per unit, according to Clean Water Action, a group working to elect environmental candidates. But biodegradable straws made by Good Start Packaging cost just shy of three cents, Jacobus said.
“We’re having problems finding landfill space for all this stuff. Less than 10% of plastic is recycled. The rest of it goes to landfills, and we’re running out of space for landfills. It’s actually becoming an economic imperative,” Jacobus said.
Despite their higher cost and flimsy architecture, paper straws are thought to be less toxic. But Jackie Nuñez, advocacy and engagement manager for Plastic Pollution Coalition, found out through testing several paper straws from various manufacturers that they aren’t as safe to drink from as people might think.
“The irony is that a lot of the paper straws that were coming on the market, the low-grade ones that I wouldn’t use anyways, they’re full of toxic dyes and glues,” said Nuñez, who is also the founder of the Last Plastic Straw, an anti-plastic straw campaign. Most of those paper straws with toxins are imported from China, she notes. Nuñez said she has tested paper straws from the US that have no toxic chemicals.
Jacobus and Nuñez say reusable straws are the best for the environment and the bottom line, but they’re unrealistic for large institutions like museums, national parks and hospitals. And while Trump’s executive order opens the door for plastic straws again, it could also open the floodgates to plastic plates, to-go containers and cups.
“Trump is now enabling federal properties, a huge purchaser of disposable products, to buy Styrofoam, an old-school product… that is super toxic for the environment. That’s what we should be focusing consumers on. No one cares about straws. That ship has sailed,” said Jacobus.