Today's Article

공지사항 1:1 Q&A 수업후기 Today's Article

The Brewing Clash on Campus between AI Chatbots and Professors

작성자: 잉글리쉬쌤 조회: 580 2024. 2. 17.

The Brewing Clash on Campus between AI Chatbots and Professors

캠퍼스에서 벌어지는 AI 챗봇과 교수의 충돌 

 

Darren Hick, Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Furman University: “Why are you doing this?”

 

Steven Kelts, Lecturer, Princeton University: “We are still going to know.”

 

CNN Anchor: These college professors say students are 1increasingly cutting and pasting 2AI-generated text in their essays, and that is 3cheating. These professors say they're not 4falling for it, and there are often three 5extremely obvious 6giveaways. 

Number one, the essay is 7suspiciously perfect. 

 

Darren Hick: A ChatGPT-generated essay looks like it was written by a very 8competent 12th grader. 

 

Christopher Bartel, Professor of Philosophy, Appalachian State University: AI-generated text has no mistakes. It's like robotically 9bland text. Nobody would actually speak that way. 

 

CNN Anchor: Another giveaway, the essay has no human voice. 

 

Steven Kelts: The built in voice of a model like ChatGPT is the voice of a 50-year-old 10compliance lawyer. 

 

Sarah Elaine Eaton, Associate Professor of Education, University of Calgary: It seems to lack 11vibrancy. There's not a lot of 12authenticstudent voice or experience in there. 

 

Christopher Bartel: An AI-generated text feels like an essay that's written by an intelligent person who has never had a class with me. 

 

CNN Anchor: And third, AI essays often say false research. 

 

Darren Hick: Perhaps the biggest thing that a ChatGPT-generated essay can do is shake the instructor's own confidence in what they know about the source material. 

 

Christopher Bartel: It will just 13make things up. It will 14attribute ideas to people that could never have had those ideas. 

 

Anthony Aumann, Professor of Philosophy, Northen Michigan University: It'll 15combine perfect grammar with something that's, like, obviously false. 

 

Penelope Adams Moon, Center for Teaching Learning Director, University of Washington: It can't 16distinguish between fact and 17fiction. It can't distinguish between information and 18disinformation. 

 

Darren Hick: It will look like it's 19quoting, and it will look like it's 20citing. But if those sources don't look familiar to you, there's a good chance this is written by AI.

  • 1
    increasingly
    점점 더, 갈수록 더
  • 2
    AI-generated
    AI가 생성한
  • 3
    cheating
    부정행위
  • 4
    falling for
    ~에 속다
  • 5
    extremely
    매우, 극도로
  • 6
    giveaways
    (은연중에) 진실을 드러내는 것
  • 7
    suspiciously
    수상쩍게, 의심스럽게
  • 8
    competent
    능숙한
  • 9
    bland
    단조로운
  • 10
    compliance
    (명령 등에) 따름
  • 11
    vibrancy
    활력
  • 12
    authentic
    진짜의
  • 13
    make up
    ~을 지어내다
  • 14
    attribute
    ~의 결과로 보다
  • 15
    combine
    결합하다
  • 16
    distinguish
    구분하다
  • 17
    fiction
    허구
  • 18
    disinformation
    허위 정보
  • 19
    quote
    인용하다
  • 20
    cite
    인용하다

 

목록으로